Chapter 21
The Son Of Man According To The Jewish Apocalypses
From what has been already discussed in these pages
it will have been that the appellation "Barnasha," or "the
Son of Man," is not a title like "Messiah," that could be
applied to every prophet, high-priest, and legally anointed
king; but that it is a proper noun, belonging exclusively to
the Last Prophet. The Hebrew Seers, Sophees, and the
Apocalyptists describe the Son of Man, who is to come in
due time as appointed by the Almighty to deliver Israel
and Jerusalem from the heathenish oppression and to
establish the permanent kingdom for "the People of the
Saints of the Most High." The Seers, the Sophees, foretell
the advent of the Powerful Deliverer; they see him - only
in a vision, revelation, and faith - with all his might and
glory. No Prophet or Sophee ever said that he himself was
"the Son of Man," and that he would "come again on the
Last Day to judge both the quick and the dead," as the
Nicene Creed puts it on the pretended authority of the
Sayings of Jesus Christ.
The frequent use of the appellation in question by the
evangelists indicates, most assuredly, their acquaintance with
the Jewish Apocalypses, as also a firm belief in their
authenticity and Divine origin. It is quite evident that the
Apocalypses bearing the names of Prophets Enoch, Moses, Baruch,
and Ezra were written long before the Gospels; and that
the name "Barnasha" therein mentioned was borrowed by
the authors of the Gospels; otherwise its frequent use would
be enigmatic and an incomprehensible - if not a meaningless - novelty. It follows, therefore, that Prophet Jesus either
believed himself to be the Apocalyptic "Son of Man," or
that he knew the Son of Man to be a person distinctly other
than himself. If he believed himself to be the Son of Man,
it would follow that either he or the Apocalyptists were in
error; and in either case the argument goes most decidedly
against Jesus Christ. For his error concerning his own
personality and mission is as bad as the erroneous predictions
of the Apocalyptists, whom he believed to be divinely
inspired. Of course, this dilemmatic reasoning will lead
us to a final conclusion unfavorable to himself. The only
way to save Prophet Jesus from this dishonor is to look upon him
as the Qur'an pictures him to us; and accordingly to attribute
all the contradictory and incoherent statements about him
in the Gospels to their authors or redactors.
Before discussing further the subject, "the Son of Man"
as depicted in the Jewish Apocalypses, a few facts must be
carefully taken into consideration. First, these Apocalypses
not only do not belong to the canon of the Hebrew Bible,
but also they are not even included among the Apocrypha
or the so-called "Deutro-canonical" books of the Old Testament. Secondly, their authorship is not known. They
bear the names of Enoch, Moses, Baruch, Ezra, but their
real authors or editors seem to have known the final
destruction of Jerusalem and the dispersion of the Jews
under the Romans. These pseudonyms were chosen, not
for fraudulent purposes, but out of a pious motive by the
Sophees or Seers who composed them. Did not Plato put
his own views and dialectics into the mouth of his master,
Socrates? Thirdly, "these books," in the words of the
Grand Rabbin Paul Haguenauer, "in an enigmatical, mystical,
supernatural form, try to explain the secrets of the nature,
the origin [sic] of God, the problems of good and evil,
justice and happiness, the past and the future. The
Apocalypse makes upon all these questions some revelations
which surpass human understanding. Their principal
personages are Enoch, Moses, Baruch, Ezra. These writings
are evidently the product of the painful and disastrous
epochs of Judaism." (1) Consequently they cannot be fully
understood any more than the Apocalypse which bears the
name of St. John the Apostle. Fourthly, these Apocalypses
have been interpolated by the Christians. In the Book of
Enoch "the Son of Man" is also called "the Son of Woman"
and "the Son of God," thus interpolating the Church theory
of incarnation; surely no Jewish Seer would write "Son of
God." Fifthly, it would be noticed that the Messianic
doctrine is a later development of the old prophecies
concerning the Last Prophet of Allah, as foretold by Jacob
and other Prophets. It is only in the Apocrypha and the
Apocalypses, and especially in the Rabbinical writings, that
this "Last Deliverer" is claimed to descend from David.
True, there are prophecies after the Babylonian captivity,
and even after the deportation of the Ten Tribes into
Assyria, about a "Son of David" who would come to gather
together the dispersed Israel. But these predictions were
fulfilled only partly under Zorobabel - a descendant of
King David. Then after the Greek invasion the same
predictions were preached and announced, and we only see
a Judah Maqbaya fighting with a slight success against
Antiochus Epiphanes. Besides, this success was temporary
and of no permanent value. The Apocalypses, which carry
their visions down to the time after the destruction of
Jerusalem by Titus and Vespasian, foretell "the Son of
Man" who will appear with great power to destroy the
Roman power and the other enemies of Israel. Twenty
centuries had to elapse before the Rome Empire was
destroyed in the fifth century A.D. by a Turkish Emperor,
Atilla - a pagan Hun - and finally by a Muslim Turk, the
Fatih Muhammad II. But that power was completely
destroyed, and for ever, in the lands promised to Ishmael
by the Sultan of the Prophets, Muhammad al-Mustapha.
------------- Footnote: 1. Munuel de Litterature Juivre Nancy, 1927.
------------ end of footnote
There remain two other observations which I cannot ignore in this connection.
If I were a most ardent Zionist, or a most learned Rabbi, I would once more
study this Messianic question as profoundly and impartially as I could. And
then I would vigorously exhort my co-religionist Jews to desist from and abandon
this hope for ever. Even if a "Son of David" should appear on the hill of Zion,
and blow the trumpet, and claim to be the "Messiah," I would be the first to
tell him boldly: "Please, Sire! You are too late! Don't disturb the equilibrium
in Palestine! Don't shed blood! Don't let your angels meddle with these formidable
aeroplanes! Whatever be the successes of your adventures, I am afraid they will
not surpass those of your ancestors David, Zorobabel, and Judah Maccabaeus (Maqbaya)!"
The great Hebrew conqueror was not David but Jesus bar Nun (Joshuah); he was
the first Messiah, who instead of conver- ting the pagan tribes of the Canaan
that had shown so much hospitality and goodness to Prophets Abraham, Isaac,
and Jacob, mercilessly massacred them wholesale. And Joshuah was, of course,
a Prophet and the Messiah of the time. Every Israelite Judge during a period
of three centuries or more was a Messiah and Deliverer. Thus we find that during
every national calamity, especially a catastrophe, a Messiah is predicted, and
as a rule the deliverance is achieved always subsequent to the disaster and
quite in an inadequate degree. It is a peculiar characteristic of the Jews that
they alone of all the nationalities aspire, through the miraculous conquests
by a Son of David, after a universal domination of the inhabi- tants of the
globe. Their slovenliness and inertia are quite compatible with their unshaking
belief in the advent of the "Lion of Judah." While they are awaiting the Moshiakh
refered to in Islam as "Massiekh, ad-dajjal" meaning the anti-Christ or the
false messiah. And that is, perhaps the reason why they have attempted to concentrate
all, their national resources, energy, and force and make a united effort to
become a self-governing people. This is the introduction of conclusion of the
appearance of the anti-christ and the appearance of the great grandson of Prophet
Muhammad, Al Mahdi, via his daughter Fatima, which
both Sunni and Shi'a believe. Al Mahdi will fight the anti-christ, then Jesus
will descend and kill him under a tree facing the Lake
of Tiberias which had been dry for a long time, but now it has been replenished.
Now to the Christians who claim Jesus to be the pro-phetical Son of Man, I would
venture to say: If he were the expected Deliverer of Israel he would have delivered
that people from the Roman yoke, no matter if the Jews had believed in him or
not. Deliverance first, gratitude and loyalty after; and not vice versa. A man
must first be liberated from the hands of his captors by killing or frighten-
ing them, and then be expected to show his permanent attachment and devotion
to the liberator. The Jews were not inmates of a hospital to be attended by
physicians and nurses; they were practically prisoners in bonds and needed a
hero to set them free. Their faith in God and in His Law was as perfect as was
that of their ancestors at the foot of Mount Sinai when He delivered it to Moses.
They were not in need of a thaumaturgical prophet; all their history was interwoven
with wonders and miracles. The raising to life of a dead Lazarus, the opening
of the eyes of a blind Barti- maeus, or the cleansing of an outcast leper, would
neither strengthen their faith nor satiate their thirst for independence and
liberty. The Jews rejected Jesus, not because he was not the Apocalyptic "Son
of Man" or the Messiah - not be- cause he was not a Prophet, for they knew very
well that he did not claim to be the former, and that he was a Prophet - but
because they hated him for his words: Messiah was not the Son of David, but
his Lord. (1) This admission of the Synoptics confirms the statement in the
Gospel of Barnabas, where Jesus is reported to have added that the Covenant
will be fulfilled with the "Shiloah" - the Prophet of Allah - who will come
from the family of Prophet Ishmael. For this reason the Talmudists describe
Jesus as "the second Balaam" - that is, the Prophet who prophesies for the benefit
of the heathen at the expense of the "chosen people."
------------ Footnote: (1). Matt. xxii 44-46; Mark xii 35-37; Luke xx.
41-44. ------------ end of footnote
It is quite clear, therefore, that the Jewish reception to,
or their rejection of, Jesus was not the condition sine qua non
to determine the nature of his mission. If he were the Final
Deliverer he would have made the Jews submit to him, nolens
volens, as Prophet Muhammad did. But the contrast between the
circumstances in which each of those two Prophets found
himself, and their work, knows no dimensions and no limits.
Suffice it to say that Prophet Muhammad converted about ten million
pagan Arabs into most sincere and ardent believers in the
true God, and utterly uprooted idolatry in the lands where
it had struck root. This he did, because he held in one
hand the Law and in the other the Scepter; the one was the
Holy Qur'an and the other the emblem of power and government. He was hated, despised, persecuted by the noblest
Arab tribe to which he belonged, and forced to flee for his
life; but by the Power of Allah he accomplished the greatest
work for cause of the true religion which no other Prophet
before him had ever been able to do.
I shall now proceed to show that the Apocalyptic Son
of Man was no other than the Prophet Muhammad al-Mustapha.
- The most cogent and
important proof that the Apocalyptic Barnasha is Prophet Muhammad is given
in a wonderful description in the vision of Prophet Daniel (vii.) already
discussed in a previous article. In no way whatever the Barnasha therein described
can be identified with any of the Macca- bees' heroes or with Prophet Jesus;
nor can the terrible Beast which was utterly killed and destroyed by that
Son of Man be a prototype of Antiochus Epiphanes or the Roman Caesar, Nero.
The culminating evil of that dreadful Beast was the "Little Horn," which uttered
blasphemies against the Most High by associating with His Essence three co-eternal
divine persons and by its persecution of those who maintained the absolute
Oneness of God. Constantine the Great is the person symbolized by that hideous
Horn.
- The Apocalypse of Enoch
(l) foretells the appearance of the Son of Man at a moment when the small
flock of the sheep, though vigorously defended by a ram, will be fiercely
attacked by the birds of prey from above and by the car- nivorous beast on
land. Among the enemies of the little flock are seen many other goats and
sheep that had gone astray. The lord of the flock, like a good shepherd, sudden-
ly appears and strikes the earth with his rod or scepter; it opens its mouth
and swallows up the assailing enemy; chases and drives away from the pastures
the rest of the pernicious birds and brutes. Then a sword is given to the
flock as an emblem of power and the weapon of destruction. After which the
flock is no longer headed by a ram but by a white bull with two large black
horns.
------------- Footnote: (1). I regret to say that the "Jewish Apocalypses"
are inaccessible to me. The Encyclopedias given only a compendium of each book,
which does not satisfy my purpose of examining the text. I know that the Irish
Archbishop Laurence has translated this Apocalypse into English, but it is,
unfortunately, beyond my reach. ------------ end of footnotes
This parabolical vision is transparent enough. From Prophet
Jacob downwards the "chosen people" is represented
symbolically by the flock of sheep. The descendants of Esau
are described as boars. Other heathen people and tribes are
represented in the vision, according to their respective characteristics, as ravens, eagles, vultures, and different species
of brutes, all thirsty to suck the blood of the sheep or hungry
to devour them. Almost all Biblical scholars agree that the
vision indicates the painful period of the Maccabees and their
bloody struggles with the armies of Antiochus Epiphanes
until the death of John Hurcanus in 110(?) B.C. This
method of interpreting the vision is totally erroneous, and
reduces the value of the whole book to nothing. That an
antediluvian Prophet or a Seer should illustrate the history
of the human race from a religious point of view, beginning
with Adam, under the symbol of a White Bull, and ending
with John Hurcanus or his brother Judah Maccabaeus
(Maqbaya) as the Last White Bull, and then leave the flock
of the "Believers" to be devoured again by the Romans, the
Christians, and the Muslims to this very day, is ridiculous
and shocking! In fact, the wars of the Maccabees and their
consequence are not of such great significance in the history
of the religion of God as to be the terminus of its development. None of the Maccabees was a Prophet, nor the
founder of the so-called "Messianic reign" which the Gospels
name the "Kingdom of God." Besides, this interpretation of
the vision is inconsistent with the characters represented in
the drama under the figurative symbols of the master of the
flock, scepter in hand, the Ram, and the White Bull; and
then with the large sword given to the shepherds with which
they kill or drive away the impure animals and birds. Furthermore, this Christian interpretation of Enoch's Apocalypse
does not explain the mystical transplantation or the transportation of the terrestrial Jerusalem into a country farther
to the south; and what meaning can be given to the new
House of God built on the spot of the old one, larger and
higher than the former sacred edifice, to which flock not only
the believing sheep - the faithful Jews - but also the various
pagan nationalities that have embraced the religion of the
Son of Man who destroyed the enemies with his Scepter or
Rod! For all these particular acts and representations are
seen and described in this dramatic vision. The chain that
links together the events depicted in this figurative language
begins with Prophet Adam and ends in the person of the Prophet
of Mecca! There are several cogent arguments to prove
this assertion.
- The two divisions of
the sheep indicate the people of the Scriptures, whether Jews or Christians,
among whom were those who were believers in the Oneness of God, and those
who made Prophet Jesus and the Holy Spirit also equal and consubstantial with
God. The Seer distinguishes the be- lievers from the apostates. The Gospels
report that on the day of the Last Judgement "the sheep will be separated
from the goats," (1) which indicates the same view. As to the symbolical Ram,
we may understand thereby Arius or some spiritual Unitarian leader for the
true Nassara and the chief Rabbi for the faithful Jews - because they both
had the same common enemy. If we identify Constantine with the evil Horn,
we may justly identify Arius with the Ram. In fact, Arius is entitled to this
dignity because he headed the larger group in the Council of Nicea and vigorously
defended the true religion against the monstrous doctrines of Trinitarian
and Sacramentarian Churches. From a strictly Muslim point of view the Jews,
from the moment they rejected and condemned Jesus Christ to death, ceased
to be the "chosen people," and that honorable title was given only to those
who believed in his apostleship.
------------- Footnote: 1. Matt. xxv. 32 - 46, etc. ------------- end
of footnote
- The Son of Man who saved
the flock of sheep from its various enemies whom he sent down into the bosom
of the earth by striking vehemently his pastoral station it and gave a strong
sword to the sheep to slaughter the impure brutes and birds of prey, was decidedly
Prophet Muhammad. The scepter (in Hebrew "shebet" - rod, staff is the emblem
of sovereignty, jurisdiction, and administration. The little scepter accorded
by God to the tribe of Judah (1) was taken away, and a stronger and larger
one was given to the Prophet of Allah (the "Shiloah") in its place. It is
indeed marvel- ous how this prophetical vision of the Seer was literally fulfilled
when Prophet Muhammad's scepter became the emblem of the Muslim sovereignty
over all the countries - in Egypt, Assyria, Chaldea, Syria, and Arabia - where
the people of God were persecuted by the pagan powers of those countries and
by the foreign heathen powers of the Medo-Persians, Greeks, and Romans! What
a glorious fulfillment of the vision it is when the flock of sheep, for many
centuries having been exposed to the merciless beaks and claws of the birds
of prey and to the sharp and terrible teeth and claws of the beasts, was now
equipped with a large sword to defend which every Muslim carried until the
blood of the Saints and Martyrs (2) was equitably avenged.
------------- Footnotes: 1. Gen. xlix. 10. 2. Rev. vi. 9 - 11. -------------
end of footnotes
- The White Bull. Until
Prophet Ishmael, all the Prophets are represented as white bulls; but from
Prophet Jacob downwards the princes of the chosen people appear in the form
of rams. The universal religion had been reduced to a national one; and the
Emperor had become a petty chief. Here is again another amazing fulfillment
of the vision in the Islamic era. The leaders or the patriarchs of the ancient
international religion are represented as white bulls, and those of the Muslim
Commanders of the Faithful also as white bulls, with the only distinction
that the latter have large black horns, emblem of twofold power, spiritual
and tem- poral. Among all clean quadrupeds there is nothing more beautiful
and noble than the white bull, and more so especial- ly when it is crowned
with a pair of large black horns. It looks most majestic and full of grace!
It is very remarkable that the Imam of the believers, whether a Calipha or
a Sultan, or possessing both titles, is distinguished and per- ceived day
and night by the purity of his faith and actions and by the solidity of his
power and majesty at the head of the vast and innumerable hosts of the faithful
composed of all races and languages! The vision expressly avows the entrance
and admission of the apostates and unbelievers into the flock. Jews - thousands
of Jews - Christians, and Sabians, as well as millions of Arabs and other
heathen nationalities, believed in the Oneness of Allah and embraced Islam.
In this connection it is worthy of note that all the blood shed in the wars
of Badr, Ohud, and other campaigns led personally by the Prophet Muhammad,
could not exceed one-hundredth of the blood shed by Prophet Joshua. Yet not
a single instance of cruelty or injustice can be proved against the Prophet
of Allah. He was clement, noble, magnanimous, and forgiving. This is why he
is alone among all the human race represented in all prophetical visions "the
Son of Man," like the first man before his fall!
- The Son of Man establishes
the Kingdom of Peace, the capital of which is no longer the old Jerusalem,
but the new Jerusalem - the "Daru 's-Salam," the "city or court of Peace."
The Sophee or Seer in this wonderful vision nar- rates how the terrestrial
Jerusalem is lifted up and trans- planted in a southern country; but a new
Temple, larger and higher than the first one, is built upon the ruins of the
old edifice! Gracious God! how wonderfully all this was accomplished by Your
most illustrious and Holy Prophet Muhammad! The new Jerusalem is none other
than Mecca, for it is in a southern country, its two hills, the "Marwa" and
"Sapha," bear the same names as those of Moriah and Zion, of the same root
and signification but originally earlier. "Irushalem" or "Urshalem" of old
becomes a city of "Light and Peace." It is for this reason, too, that Mecca
as the seat of the sacred Ka'aba became the "Qibla" - the direction towards
which the Muslims turn their faces at prayer. Here every year tens of thousands
of pilgrims from all Muslim countries assemble, visit the Holy Ka'aba, offer
sacrifices, and renew their fidelity to Allah and promise to lead a new life
worthy of a Muslim. Not only Mecca, but also Medina and the territory surrounding
them, has become sacred and inviolable, and forbidden to any non-Muslim man
or woman! It was in the fulfillment of his vision of Prophet Idris or Enoch,
too, that the second Caliph, Omar, rebuilt the Sacred Mosque at Jerusalem
on the hill of Moriah, on the spot of the Temple of Solomon! All these marvelously
prove that the vision was seen by a Seer inspired by God, who saw the Muslim
events in a far-distant future. Could Rome or Byzantium claim to be the New
Jerusalem? Can the Pope or any schismatic Patriarch claim to be the Apocalyptic
White Bull with two large horns? Can Christianity claim to be the Kingdom
of Peace (Islam = "Shalom") while it makes Prophet Jesus and the Holy Ghost
coeval and consubstantial with the Absolute One God? Most decidedly not.
- In those chapters dealing
with the Kingdom of Peace, the Messiah is called Son of Man, but in the description
of the Last Judgement which follows at the end of this Reign of Islam or Peace
he is called "Son of Woman" and "Son of God," and made to share with God in
the Judgement of the World. It is admitted by all scholars that these extravagant
and foolish statements are not of Jewish origin but belong to the Christian
imagina- tions, inserted and interpolated by them.
The other Apocalypses, those which bear the names of
Moses, Baruch, Ezra, the Jubilees, and the Oracula
Sibylliana, should be studied impartially, for it is then that
they, like those of Daniel and Enoch, will not only be understood but also prove to be fulfilled in Prophet Muhammad.
No Copyright:
Any
organisation or individual wishing to reprint or copy the contents of
this website
may do so as long as the information is kept in its original form,
names of
all authors and sources are kept intact and is used for non-malicious
purposes.
An acknowledgement would be HIGHLY appreciated.
|
